20/08/2021 People Are Shelling Out Six Figures for NFT Rocks

If you don't have $300,000 to drop on this crypto-collectible, you can also download the original clipart for $0.

In the world of non-fungible tokens, nothing is off the table. After seeing people ready to pour out ridiculous amounts of cash to own NFT’s of fartscat pictures, and Lindsay Lohan fanart, you might be wondering what absurd shit will find its way onto the blockchain next. And apparently, the answer is clipart. Clipart of a rock. Clipart of a rock that anyone can download for free right here, but that is also being sold on the blockchain for the price of a small house

 

If reading that doesn’t make you want to walk into the ocean, then good news: You, too, can own one of the EtherRock up for sale right now, for the low, low price of $272,679. And that cost is only going to keep going up. When the anonymous dev behind this project first rolled out these collectibles in 2017, there were only 100 pet rocks put into circulation. As the site explaining the project points out, this limited run means that “each new virgin rock gets more and more expensive.” 

They also helpfully added that these virtual rocks don’t serve a purpose “beyond being able to be brought and sold, and giving you a strong sense of pride in being an owner of 1 of the only 100 rocks in the game.” So, yeah. 

Apparently, that pitch was enough to bring crypto collectors on board. Two weeks ago, the angel investor-turned crypto personality Gary Vaynerchuk tweeted about EtherRock as one of the “pre-2019 NFT projects” to keep an eye on over the next decade. Almost immediately, people began throwing down cash, and their prices skyrocketed. Since Vaynerchuk’s tweet went out, transaction records show the price of a single pet rock going from 1.2 ETH (roughly $3,700 USD) to 32 ETH (roughly $99,200 USD) to 80 ETH (roughly $248,600 USD). Over the past day, buyers have spent more than $664,000 combined on these collectibles, that, again, are literally just slightly tinted versions of the same royalty-free clipart that anyone can download. 

 

Different folks have different motivations for buying one of these rocky buddies. One buyer explained in a Twitter thread that their $46,300 purchase was a way to own a bit of NFT history.

“As we get into an age of digital collectibles, being one of the earliest forms of the art and the first do something gives them provenance that is valuable,” they wrote. “The pet rocks present the perfect shock value, it’s so stupid that it’s perfect. Fate loves irony.”

Another buyer who dropped about $25,000 on his own rock told Motherboardthat these buys were either “the stupidest or the most incredible decision of our lives.” He added that while he thought the concept was dumb at first, “FOMO kicked in,” the way FOMO tends to do, and $25,000 later he had a tiny piece of NFT history of his very own. And I totally get the sentiment—the internet’s architecture is doomed to rot from within as time goes on, leaving all of us with the job of archiving or buying bits of net history before they’re gone for good. But when that piece of history is some low-res clipart of a rock, you’re probably better off saving your money and downloading that thing for free.

Arts

https://gizmodo.com/people-are-shelling-out-six-figures-for-nft-rocks-1847508926

Interesting NFTs
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great José Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?
tre/2.3 Unique 1/1
tre/2.3 Unique 1/1
#70912
By OthersideDeployer
30K
Artist notes: the halving ceremony is the most unusual part of modern bitcoin production in which the owners bet on how efficiently an alpha can inseminate the market.
Discord Assembly
Discord logo factory. 3D animation, 10-second loop, 30 fps. Created using Cinema4D, X-Particles, Octane, and After Effects. Originally posted on TikTok (@jigpx) on 2/20/21. 47.5m+ views, 3.2m+ likes (as of 4/22/21).