10/01/2022 Pudgy Penguins NFT Project Ousts Founders as Mood Turns Icy

NFT influencers clash over the fate of Pudgy Penguins, raising governance questions surrounding non-fungible token communities.

54VXMBIAPVHJ5LRPQ7AH3JAHHM.png

There’s trouble brewing in the huddle.

The beloved NFT projectPudgy Penguinsvoted out its founders on Thursday after they allegedly failed to deliver on stated goals and drained the treasury of funds. And now at least one splinter group is arguing that the entire project should be decentralized, potentially an industry first.

Launched in July,Pudgy Penguinshas become one of the most successful NFT projects, raking in over45,400 ETH in saleson NFT marketplace OpenSea. (That works out to about $140 million in today’s ether (ETH) prices.) NFT stands for “non-fungible tokens,” a subcategory of cryptocurrencies that represents ownership in a unique asset, from art to real estate.

The collection of 8,888 chubby and flightless Antarctic creatures – donning accessories such as baseball caps and fishing rods – were available to mint last July for 0.03 ETH and sold out in less than 20 minutes.

According to Twitter user and Pudgy Penguins owner@9x9x9eth, Pudgy Penguins co-founderCole Thereum“promised a game, a token, an educational book on NFTs and more” to the community last September.

“After a half year, they still have not yet set up the team, they are still in the stage of hiring,” 9x9x9 told CoinDesk via Twitter.

(9x9x9 publicly stated he has spent nearly 600 ETH on the collection and holds 242 Pudgy Penguins NFTs and one rare “banana” penguin, purchased for 100 ETH.)

Pudgy Penguins pseudonymous co-founders Cole Thereum and Twitter user@tubbyfatdidn’t immediately respond to a request for comment via Twitter direct message.

On Wednesday evening, 9x9x9 publisheda Twitter threadclaiming the Pudgy Penguins founders were looking to abandon the project and offered to sell him its shell for 888 ETH (about $2.8 million), an offer he turned down.

Since the tweets,the floor priceof a Pudgy Penguin shot up from about 0.6 ETH ($1,860) on Wednesday evening to 1.7 ETH ($5,270) as of press time.

Now, the project has received buyout offers as high as 750 ETH ($2.3 million) from other prominent individuals in the NFT market, includingMintableco-founderZach Burks, NFT collector@beaniemaxandNetz Capital’sLuca Netz.

Others in the community are more wary of a buyout. NFT hedge fundStarry Night Capital’s@Vince_Van_DoughandeGirl Capital’s@loomdart– other prominent stakeholders in the project – have floated the idea of migrating the community to a new project calledWrapped Penguins.

The Pudgy Penguins founding team receives a small percentage in royalties from each NFT sale, meaning founders of successful projects can continue to line their pockets as long as trading volume persists.

Wrapped Penguins,available as a free minton NFT platformMetadropfor current Penguin holders, would sever all ties with the original founding team with the new project in the hope of creating a parallel community that would be governed using a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework.

A wrapper is asmart contractthat takes an asset and issues a parallel asset, allowing the Pudgy Penguins NFT holder to hold an identical “wrapped” penguin. The Wrapped Penguins project has said the holder will be able to “unwrap” their token into the original NFT at any time.

Profile picture projects (PFP) such as Pudgy Penguins, Larva Labs’ CryptoPunks and Yuga Labs’ Bored Ape Yacht Club have driven the recent boom in NFT sales, often run by centralized founding teams who tease new releases for their holders.

Pudgy Penguins “could be the first pure decentralized PFP project ever,” 9x9x9 told CoinDesk.

The battle for control over the Pudgy Penguins project also raises governance questions surrounding NFT communities – or more broadly, what happens when founders fail to deliver on stated goals or the communities themselves experience infighting.

Recent events are reminiscent of battles that have plagued major blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, known in the industry as“hard forks.”

“In real life, stakeholders can use the board to dump a poorly performing CEO. This is the first attempt I’ve seen in crypto to do in essence the same thing,” tweetedJordi Alexander, chief investment officer ofSelini Capital. “The community forks everything out without the baggage of the CEO.”

Amid the turmoil, some Pudgy Penguin holders have used the spotlight to spread a popular Pudgy rallying cry: “I am my penguin and my penguin is me.”

Arts

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/01/07/pudgy-penguins-nft-project-ousts-founders-as-mood-turns-icy/https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/01/07/pudgy-penguins-nft-project-ousts-founders-as-mood-turns-icy/

Interesting NFTs
Finite.
⨍
#81451
By OthersideDeployer
Poem by Funya no Asayasu, court pages in boat trying to keep it steady in the wind as they harvest lotus leaves, from the series One Hundred Poems by One Hundred Poets, Explained by the Nurse
Katsushika Hokusai (1760-1849) Poem by Funya no Asayasu, court pages in boat trying to keep it steady in the wind as they harvest lotus leaves, from the series One Hundred Poems by One Hundred Poets, Explained by the Nurse late 1830s - Japan
Wink
The eye of providence blinks. Originally posted to tumblr June 26, 2012.
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great José Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?