21/04/2022 NFT collectors are clamoring for Moonbirds, digital owls with $281 million in sales. Here’s why they’re obsessed

The collection, called Moonbirds, already ranks among hugely successful collections like Azuki, Bored Ape Yacht Club, and CryptoPunks.

Though massive sales of NFTs aren’t uncommon, the quick success of Moonbirds—digital art of cartoon owls— stunned many people in the NFT community.

Wait, what are Moonbirds?

The Moonbird NFT collection launched on Saturday, and quickly sold out in a fixed-price drop, the industry’s term for a debut.

Interest in the collection of 10,000 birds was high partly because of the people behind it: the Proof Collective, a group of 1,000 NFT collectors. Members include well-known NFT figures, including artist Mike Winkelmann, known as Beeple, and investor Gary Vaynerchuk.

Proof Collective’s cofounders, Kevin Rose and Justin Mezzell, are also highly visible in the NFT world. Rose, for example, is a venture capitalist at True Ventures who focuses on blockchain startups and hosts popular podcasts focused on crypto.

Membership in Proof Collective wasn’t cheap. In early December 2021, the average price for a Proof NFT, which represents membership to the group,was 1.99 Ether, or around $7,900at that time, according to NFT marketplace OpenSea. Currently,the minimum price is now 98 Ether,or $285,670.

But Proof offers members access to events, its private Discord group chat, and collaborations,its website says. One of those collaborations is Moonbirds.

Any member of the public was able toenter a raffleto be guaranteed access to mint, or create, Moonbird NFTs upon their launch. One mint was allowed per raffle winner for2.5 Ether, or about $7,500, according to the Moonbirds website.

Proof members were able to enter the raffle as well, but were also guaranteed two Moonbirds for every Proof membership NFT they owned.

Of the 10,000 Moonbirds total, 7,875 were allotted for those who won the raffle; 2,000 for Proof Collective members; and125 for distributionby the Moonbirds team.

The Moonbirds drop was clouded with controversy, with accusations by some thatbots had manipulated the raffleto their benefit and concerns that the project’s leaders used inside knowledge to buy Moonbirds that featured rare traits, which could lead to their price being higher in the future, asCoinDesk reported.

Those who hold Moonbirds can also “nest,” or stake, their NFTs to “accrue additional benefits as total nested time accumulates,” its website says. This means that NFT holders can get upgrades like “enhanced drops and rewards” over time.

To Proof’s founders, the success surrounding Moonbirds is the beginning of a company. On Saturday, Roseposted a YouTube videoin which he said Proof would use the proceeds to “build a new media company.”

Moonbirds supporters see the NFT drop and planned ecosystemas valuableandsomething likewhat Yuga Labs built with its successful Bored Ape Yacht Club, a top NFT collection that grew to become the center of its own metaverse and ecosystem. But others said the surge in value was suspicious.

ATwitteraccount, NFT Ethics, that acts as a watchdog over the NFT industry, tweeted on Friday and accused the Proof Collective of“wash trading”its membership NFTs, or manipulating their price. That’s when aseller is on both sides of a transaction, so as to create an artificially high value for an asset.NFT Ethics alsoaccused the Collective of "nepotism"by trading or giving freemembership NFTs to family and friends.

Roseresponded to the criticism on Twitterby saying “Wow, just wow, this is so riddled with falsities it's ridiculous - invite me to any podcast, any time... you're just making things up at this point.”

Rose, Mezzell, and Proof Collective chief operating officer Ryan Carson did not immediately respond toFortune’srequests for comment.

NFTs as a ‘fundraising mechanism’

As the price of Moonbirds continues to soar in the secondary market, with nearly 70,000 ETH, or $205 million, involume traded on NFT auction site OpenSea, some see this as a “turning point” for the NFT market as a means of startup fundraising.

“Moonbirds is one of the first majorly successful (so far) projects that is unashamed about what it is. Kevin [Rose] and Ryan [Carson] have been very clear that they're raising money, that they're not ‘selling art’, that they'll treat the money as funds to build a product, etc,” Daniel Tenner, founder of startup funding service Grant Tree,wrote on Twitter.

Correction, April 18, 2022: A previous version of this article included a misspelling of the last name of Proof co-founder Justin Mezzell.

Arts

https://fortune.com/2022/04/18/moonbird-nft-collection-surge/

Interesting NFTs
Chromie Squiggle #7583
Simple and easily identifiable, each squiggle embodies the soul of the Art Blocks platform. Consider each my personal signature as an artist, developer, and tinkerer. Public minting of the Chromie Squiggle is permanently paused. They are now reserved for manual distribution to collectors and community members over a longer period of time. Please visit OpenSea to explore Squiggles available on the secondary market.
iNFT // To the Young Artists of Cyberspace
ERC-721 iNFT Token ID: 0 1 10bm GIF iNFT + 13 MP4 NFTs Minted on May 30, 2021, ed. 1/1 Main contract utilizes many elements from the subcontract 0x3D10E9869c932270BdA0c9D702E6BA802Ae6b3f7 to function correctly. This contract holds the 13 seed text NFT’s Smart Contract Addresses: NFT (1 GIF): 0x42Eb865DFc9774E2cb0cBa1A9100D0e39b480eCf AI Pod: 0xD028C602A1C6aB192436718e316D2eD64B131AC8 iNFT (holder of AI Pod): 0xaBff758ecbB63Dc408Ff57127472607975160917 Seed text portfolio (13 MP4’s): 0x3D10E9869c932270BdA0c9D702E6BA802Ae6b3f7
缥缈之美的过去与现在(Vanitas Then and Now)
虚空派的画像。在这个虚拟时代,外在之美到底是否还受到时间的限制?(Vanitas portrait of a woman. Is beauty finite or not in the Virtual age?)
#63289
By OthersideDeployer
Genesis
José Delbo sent me his striking pencil sketch and powerful inked work, which I then interpreted in oil on canvas. I wanted to create a very painterly piece with obvious brush marks etc, but I was also aiming for a nostalgic feel, a kind of 1980’s superhero comic book look, the kind I grew up with. My goal with this animation was to try to recreate, in part, the creative process that both artists went through with the visual information I had. I was able to showcase my painting process more accurately as I could take photographs of my progress throughout. Consecutive images could then be layered like brush strokes over José’s drawing to create the impression that this was one continuous artwork from pencil, to ink, to completed painting. The representation of the line sketch at the beginning, then pencil/ink and lastly the paint layers being applied demonstrate both artists’ struggle for the right lines, tone, form, and colour until the work is finally completed. As the oil was still wet with each photograph the glare of my studio lights can be seen in the brush strokes. Eventually, the figure emerges and as it does, our hero comes to life, looking directly at the viewer -- but is he grimacing in approval or disgust? We will never know for sure as just before he can say anything, white paint is brushed across the canvas entirely and the process begins again. Only the bat is quick enough to escape.