05/08/2022 Why Ethereum NFT Creators Are Giving Away Commercial Rights—To Everyone

As Moonbirds and XCOPY artwork both transition to CC0 licenses, here’s a look at why creators are embracing the public domain.


Moonbirds (left) and XCOPY's artwork are entering the public domain. Image: Proof/XCOPY
Moonbirds (left) and XCOPY's artwork are entering the public domain. Image: Proof/XCOPY

Moonbirdsis one of 2022’smost successful NFT projects, yielding more than half a billion dollars’ worth of trading volume in a matter of months. Buying one will cost youat least $29,000 worth of ETHas of this writing. But its creators have now decided that you won’t have to own a Moonbird to use its imagery.

Proof—theWeb3startup behind the Proof CollectiveNFTgroup and Moonbirds—announced that it will transition Moonbirds and the recentOdditiesNFT collections to a CC0, orCreative Commons Zero, license.

Effectively, it means that no rights are reserved by the creators, and it puts the artwork into the public domain. As a result, anyone can use the Moonbirds or Oddities artwork and likenesses to create and sell derivative projects, merchandise, apparel—anything.

Proof co-founder Kevin Rose, tech entrepreneur and venture capitalist,posted a Twitter threadwith the news today, starting off by noting his co-creation of social platform Digg in 2004. The Web2 veteran said that Digg’s pioneering features were quickly mimicked and iterated upon by competing platforms.

“The default gut reaction is to protect what you’ve created,” wrote Rose. “But Web3 is a chance to reboot and reexamine everything back to first principles. A chance to say that others don’t have to fail for us to win. A chance to be more inclusive and open to all.”

Like other CC0 projects, Moonbirds will rely on the provenance of theEthereum blockchain to prove that the NFTs are the original creations. “The authenticity of Moonbirds will not come from lawyers enforcing trademarks,” Rose wrote, “but rather from the proven provenance and single source of truth ofsmart contracts.”

Proof’s announcement comes just days after pseudonymous crypto artistXCOPY tweetedthat they would also open up all of their previous artwork to public domain.

XCOPY makes a very different kind of NFT artwork than Moonbirds—their specialty is single-edition digital illustrations that havesold for millions of dollars apiece.XCOPY had previously put their “Right Click, Save As Guy” artwork—which sold for nearly $7.1 million worth of ETH in December 2021—into the public domain.

On Monday, XCOPY wrote that their“summer.jpg” artworkwould also be given CC0 status… along with everything else they made that’s not a collaboration.

“We haven’t really seen a CC0 summer yet, but I believe it’s coming,” XCOPY wrote, “I’m going to go ‘all in’ and apply CC0 [to] all my existing art.”

Why CC0?

Proof and XCOPY are the latest major Ethereum NFT creators to tap into the growing CC0 movement, but they aren’t alone.Nouns, a novel NFT project that auctions a single NFT per day and gives owners voting rights to a valuableDAO treasury, isarguably the best-known CC0 projectin the space.

Nouns’ imagery, including the boxy “Noun glasses,” can be used for all manner of derivative NFT projects—and it has, if Lil’ Nouns, 3D Nouns, and NounPunks are any indication. That’s just the tip of the iceberg, and we’re seeing the Nouns aesthetic spread into merchandise and other avenues as the one-year anniversary of itslaunch approaches.

How Ethereum NFT Project Nouns Is Building Open-Source IP

Launched in August, Nouns stands apart from many other Ethereum-based avatar projects with a couple of unique hooks. It produces and auctions just one pixel character NFT per day, which consis...

In fact, the Nouns glasses werefeatured in a Bud Light commercialduring the last Super Bowl. The Bud Light brandowns a Nouns NFTand participates in DAO votes, but it didn’t have to own the NFT to use the glasses in the commercial. That might be an unexpected twist, but it aligns well with the decentralized, open-source ethos of the Web3 movement.

“You don’t need copyright anymore,” Nouns co-creator4156toldDecryptlast November. “In the same way that academic citations make the original paper more important, citation of Nouns in whatever form they come in—at least, this is our thesis—will make the originals more important and more valuable.”

In other words, in the view of 4156 and many other CC0 advocates, the growing use and proliferation of the IP should accrue value back to the original NFT creations, rather than take away from them. In fact, the goal is to spread the imagery far and wide, like memes.

But there are NFT owners that potentially benefit from that open-source IP expansion.

“CC0+NFT does for media whatBitcoindid for currency: it transforms an adversarial game into a co-operative one,”4156 tweetedin May, as noted by anextensive a16z Crypto explainerof the CC0 movement published on Wednesday.

It’s a grand experiment, and with Nouns, it’s only been a year. On the other hand, Nouns imagery has already gotten exposure during a Super Bowl broadcast. And beyond openly enabling and encouraging derivative works, the Nouns DAO continually uses its vast treasury to fund projects that help further expand and spread the IP.

Bud Light Super Bowl Ad Includes Nouns Ethereum NFT Imagery

On Monday, Bud Light revealed a Super Bowl commercial that features imagery from the Ethereum-based Nouns NFT project, confirmingDecrypt's recent reporting. The commercial, titled “Zero in th...

The Nouns auction and DAO model is unique, but there are many other CC0 projects out there, includingGoblintown,CrypToadz, Mfers, Anonymice, and Blitmap. Loot is anotherwell-known example of the concept, as the NFT lists of fantasy gear can be used as the basis for all sorts of projects—including games and narrative products.

Unlike those projects, Moonbirds didn’t start as a CC0 project: it’s opening up to the public, regardless of what the thousands of NFT owners think. Rose, for his part, appears to be at peace with the idea of handing over the keys to… well, anyone and everyone.

“We can’t change our minds,” he tweeted. “We’re rooting for you and can’t wait to help promote and support all your creative endeavors.”

Arts

https://decrypt.co/106761/why-ethereum-nft-creators-are-giving-away-commercial-rights-to-everyone

Interesting NFTs
Lim Hedra #1/20
Domestic - 2017
“Domestic is the manifestation of the cultural patriarchy in my home. The wooden "woman's" tragedy of false desire. It was done in a moment of breakup. The hollow 3d body & its lost eyes, invites you to fill up. Trying to reach out, encumbered and wrapped in its own fragility, the new mother rises."
The Moth Catcher
In this psychologically bed-headed portrait, a creature sets in a trance; his eyes devolved and vestigal, his third eye open but hardened and in a form resembling a Sharingan. The imagery therefore expresses an awareness existing in corporeal introspection. The creature’s mind sprouts, on the left side, an emerging face, grinning. To the right side of the head, red tentacles and fingers intertwine–a collaboration of invertebrate and vertebrate consciousness cooperatively handling paint brushes of the sort used to build an oil painting. The neck and throat bristle with random thorns, as from a rose or the upper portions of a beak sprouting from its flesh. The neck itself disassociates into layers of membranous material, terminating upon an abstracted base of convoluted forms composing its body. The nose is virtually non existent, more a sinus reiterative of the shape of the third eye. Set against the exposed teeth peering out of thick, meaty cheeks, a skeleton-like impression results. That impression sets behind a visceral set of lips and tongue, which is the creature’s prime seat of awareness. Sensual, organic, the tongue organ hangs, meaty, and with consciousness of a sea cucumber. It illuminates at the tip, drawing the attraction of a nearby moth–with mystery of purpose.
Bigigi
Moonfae are a race of outlandish creatures in the world of The Beacon. Settlers named them so because of their otherworldy nature and their apparent relation to the moon.
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great José Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?