25/03/2022 New tech, old scams: Don't fall for these crypto and NFT ripoffs

Web3 productslike non-fungible tokensand cryptocurrencies are already changing the world, a shift that blockchain evangelists say will revolutionize how the internet is constructed, how we bank and transfer money, how people pay for goods and even how we socialize in the nascent metaverse.

For now, most Americans couldn't care less. Google searches show interest is already cooling in NFTs, bitcoin, decentralized autonomous organizations and other innovations associated with Web3. One reason? Rampant fraud, experts told CBS MoneyWatch.

Among a string of incidents, hackers swipedNFTs valued at $2.2 millionin January from New York art collector Todd Kramer. A month later at OpenSea — the world's largest NFT market — an estimated $1.7 million worth of NFTs werestolenin an alleged phishing scam. And users of the MetaMask, one of the most popular crypto wallets, routinely reportunauthorized transactions. According to Check Point Research, last fall MetaMask users lost about $500,000 in a targeted phishing attack.

nft-google-search.png Google search trends for NFTs dropped significantly in early 2022.Google

"The average selling price of NFTs and number of accounts buying and selling NFTs weekly have also dropped," said Anand Sanwal, a tech analyst forCB Insight. "The market's slump is raising questions about the long-term outlook for NFTs, which saw $41 [billion] in sales and an explosion of VC investment in 2021."

In another sign concerns about fraud are taking a toll, trading volume on OpenSea is down 80% in March from its peak in February, according to theFinancial Times.

Expect the downward trend in NFT trading to continue though 2022, said Dan Ives, a tech analyst at investment firm Wedbush. "It's been a very slow start for the NFT market in 2022 with some major growing pains ahead. Along with a handful of high-profile scams, there has been a black cloud over the NFT market. Some bad actors have clearly taken the bloom off the rose."

nft-opensea.png NFT trading volume on OpenSea, one of the largest digital asset markets, dropped in early 2022.FT/CB Insights

Crypto and NFTs are also confusing and risky, said Molly White, editor of the satirical siteWeb3IsGoingGreat.com, noting that "regulatory agencies have not really cracked down" on the bad actors.

"The hype and noise undermine a lot of the trust most people need to get involved," she added. "The scams are hard to avoid."

"One of the biggest flaws of web3 is the lack of regulation," says@molly0xFFFofhttps://t.co/eqT2FmbVT1pic.twitter.com/I2YjfGnDYg

— Dan Patterson (@DanPatterson)March 8, 2022

If you're thinking about putting money in cryptocurrencies, NFTs or so-called decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO), beware these common scams.

Rug pull

The "rug pull" happens when a startup or influencer promotes a crypto token, NFT or DAO project, solicits public investment, then vanishes with the cash or stops updating the project. To entice investors, these projects often launch on reputable platforms or claimcelebrity involvement. According toChainanalysis, a company that tracks and analyzes blockchain trends, investors lost almost $3 billion to these types of schemes last year.

One if the most notorious examples is the "Squid Game" rug pull. In 2021, a group of developers who were unrelated to the hit Netflix show created a pay to earn crypto-card game. To fund its development, the team asked public investors to purchase a "Squid coin," which at its peak was valued at $2,860. It plunged when the coin's creators abruptly canceled the project, citing "stress," and disappeared with $3.3 million from the wallet.

Such tactics are nothing new, White told CBS MoneyWatch. "It's not even an innovative scam, it just scales well,"she added, noting that potential investors should be wary of small-scale schemes as well as the well-publicized projects. "Sometimes with the smaller projects the same scammers have done [the rug pull] multiple times," White said.

Wash trading

Buying NFTs can be a frustrating experience. Some NFTs sell formillions, while others gather digital dust. And some seem to skyrocket in value for no discernible reason after a flurry of trades.

According to the Chainalysis report, some of that activity comes down to what is known as "wash trading." In that century-old scheme, the buyer and seller of an investment collude to artificially inflate its value and make it appear as though there is significant outside interest. Sometimes the buyer and seller are the same person or business. The practice wasbanned by the Commodity Exchange Act in 1936, and the IRS prohibits taxpayers from deducting losses from wash trading.

With NFTs, the goal of wash trading is to "make one's NFT appear more valuable than it really is by 'selling it' to a new wallet the original owner also controls," Chainalysis said in areport. Because some of the most prominentcrypto-walletsdon't require users to verify their identity, it'srelatively easyto make multiple accounts and simply trade the NFT back and forth.

The report uncovered 262 users that traded NFTs back and forth to self-owned wallets 25 times — 110 of these users made a profit. In total,grifters raked in almost $9 million from wash trading NFTslast year, according to ZDNet.

Pump and dump

Pump-and-dump schemes, long a staple of penny-stock scams, involve artificially inflating an asset's value by making misleading statements and misrepresenting investor demand. These schemes are especially common with small or obscure cryptocurrencies and NFTs that lure investors by touting the opportunity to get in early on a coin that could have big potential later.

Most U.S. states, as well as the federal government, prohibit similarly manipulative stock market scams, but crypto investorslost millions last yearto pump and dump schemes.

"With this scam the people who issue the token get influential people to really talk it up without disclosing they were paid or are part of the project," White said. "The price of the token skyrockets because, you know, 'Kim Kardashian is part of the project and it's gonna be big!' Then they sell off the tokens and people lose interest, and the whole thing plummets back down."

Some allege that scenario appears to be playing out now with EthereumMax, a cryptocurrency promoted by Kardashian that recently shot up in valuation after her endorsement, then quickly tumbled. A group of investors earlier this year filed a class actionlawsuit naming Kardashian, boxer Floyd Mayweather, basketball player Paul Pierce and others, alleging the celebrities received payments to promote the token by claiming early investors could "make significant returns" from purchasing the currency.

Arts

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cryptocurrency-nft-scams/

Interesting NFTs
The River Plate Machine
Digital illustration for the cover of These Football Times magazine in its issue dedicated to the Argentine football team "Club Atlético River Plate". Original from 2020. For this cover I have created a complex machine that links all the generations and legends of the club with its great shield and emblem crowning the center as the heart of the fantasy machinery. Full of details and ornaments this is a highly detailed work. An authentic trip to the history of River through the imagination and the colors of the club. The most significant titles of the club are also included, such as the Libertadores Cup, the famous Intercontinental and the new Super Liga and the Argentine Cup in its newest cup design. If you see a hen, don't be surprised, it is the nickname that its fans give themselves, and they like it. ----- https://javierarres.com/about.html
Sophia Instantiation
Sophia Instantiation by Sophia the AI robot x Andreas Bonaceto
Yudibe
Moonfae are a race of outlandish creatures in the world of The Beacon. Settlers named them so because of their otherworldy nature and their apparent relation to the moon.
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great José Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?
#85150
By OthersideDeployer