24/03/2023 Code is Not Law: Case on Who Owns the First NFT Dismissed by Judge


This week, James Cott, a judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dismissed the case, saying that the company failed to establish ownership, malice, or damages.The plaintiff claimed that between 2014 and 2021, McCoy had let his ownership ofQuantumlapse. McCoy had minted his novel NFT on a blockchain called Namecoin, which requires users to update their records every 200 to 250 days, if a user fails to do so, others are free to claim the “blocks” in the blockchain that contain records of ownership. Free Holdings claimed that in 2015, McCoy failed to update his records and, in the spring of 2021, as the NFT market was heating up, Free Holdings claimed theQuantumblockchain record on Namecoin. As part of preparing for the sale, McCoy and Sotheby’s mintedQuantumon the Ethereum blockchain, saying that the record for the original had been “burned” or destroyed when the registration lapsed. McCoy preserved the on-chain data once held on Namecoin to the Ethereum blockchain, which represents a more modern standard.The case brought a central tenant of Web3 before the legal system: that code is law. For those invested in the ideological project of crypto, ownership is a simple matter of possession. If you have crypto or NFTs in your wallet, it’s yours. No insurer, bank, government agency or other third party should interfere. Running the risk of being stolen from or cheated in some way is the price of freedom from outside meddling.But, as Kevin McCoy toldARTnews, “When you take a matter to federal court it’s the opposite of code is law—law is law.”This isn’t to say that the court didn’t take into account the nuances of digital ownership. In the Opinion and Order handed down this week, the judge took into consideration different, existing interpretations of ownership within the context of Namecoin blockchain. Namecoin functions by assigning a token a “Name” that is associated with a public key, or a string of numbers, that assigns ownership of the token. Similarly, as with NFTs minted on Ethereum, which consist of the representation and the receipt (or smart contract) which contains records of ownership, there is a vital split in the digital asset. Because of this split, there are different interpretations of what constitutes the actual asset. One interpretation is that the token —the representation— is the asset, and that re-registering the asset to a different public key, once the previous one has lapsed, is just the creation of a new receipt, not a new work.

But there are others who believe that the NFTisthe public key, and that when an NFT on Namecoin is re-registered, a new work has been created.

The third interpretation is that the creation of a new registry marks the creation of a new NFT that nonetheless retains the history, or provenance, of the public key that came before it.

The judge appeared to lean on the second interpretation in their Opinion, arguing that Free Holdings failed to make a convincing argument as to why they were entitled toQuantum, as it existed on the Ethereum blockchain, vis-a-vis their ownership of a re-registered receipt, which represents a wholly different NFT.

“Free Holdings has demonstrated nothing more than an attempt to exploit open questions of ownership in the still-developing NFT field to lay claim to the profits of a legitimate artist,” Judge Cott said in his dismissal.

The case represents an interesting meeting of Web3 and the law, with the boundaries of digital ownership more clearly defined, but not totally in view.

The lawyers representing Free Holdings did not respond to a request for comment, though they did tell theNew York Times that the team was “evaluating its options.”

Arts

https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/kevin-mccoy-quantum-case-dismissed-free-holdings-sothebys-1234662076/

Interesting NFTs
#85699
By OthersideDeployer
BTC POWER
BTC POWER
Rare Thanos PNG
For Stickers...
Source Code for the WWW
OWNER: Sir Tim Berners-Lee Sir Tim Berners-Lee, b. 1955 Source Code for the WWW 1990-1991 Work includes: Original archive of dated and time-stamped files containing the source code, written between 3 October 1990 and 24 August 1991. These files contain code with approximately 9,555 lines, the contents of which include implementations of the three languages and protocols invented by Sir Tim; HTML (Hypertext Markup Language); HTTP (Hyper Transfer Protocol); and URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers), as well as the original HTML documents that instructed early web users on how to use the application Animated visualization of the code being written (Video, black & white, silent), lasting 30 minutes 25 seconds A Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) representation of the full code (A0 841mm wide by 1189 mm high), created by Sir Tim from the original files using Python, with a graphic representation of his physical signature at lower right A letter written in the README.md file (in “markdown” format) by Sir Tim in June of 2021, reflecting upon the code and his process of creating it Non-fungible Token ERC-721 Minted on June 15, 2021, ed. 1/1 Smart Contract Address: 0x86ade256037d80d6d42df8df96d5be21cd25bd8f
Pink Topaz
Shalom! I'm Pink Topaz. In high school, I was voted school jock. My great-great-great-great-great-great grandkitty lived with Nelson Mandela. I look forward to sweating through my feet with you.