25/03/2022 G2 Esports files lawsuit against NFT provider Bondly

(The Washington Post illustration; G2 Esports)

According to copies of two contracts attached as exhibits to the filing, G2 and Bondly entered into a two-year exclusive partnership on June 2, 2021. As a participant in that partnership, Bondly was tasked with developing and acting as the sales agent for G2′s NFTs. The company was also on the hook for a series of fees: an annual rights fee of $2 million, as well as an advance guarantee of $1.25 million, paid out in installments that Bondly could recoup in the course of NFT sales.

The arrangement in the contracts states esports brand granted Bondly access to its intellectual property — images, video and audio relating to the company and its esports teams — and planned to promote the company as an “Official Partner of G2 Esports.”

Neither G2, its legal representatives nor Bondly responded to The Washington Post’s requests for comment.

G2 alleges in the lawsuit that shortly after the first rights fee invoice was sent, a representative for Bondly wrote to G2 that the company was “past the point of being able to successfully deliver an NFT program.” In subsequent communications, G2 alleges the two parties could not come to an agreement over who was in charge of responsibilities outlined in the contract, and that Bondly sought to pause the agreement — a move that G2 rejected. According to the claims in the filing, several weeks later Bondly attempted to terminate the agreement between the two companies, citing G2′s unwillingness to work toward a mutually agreed upon solution.

In the filing, G2 alleges its brand’s reach and cachet were a huge draw for Bondly.

“Bondly and its agents knew that their representations were false when they made them, or made the representations recklessly and without regard to their truth,” the filing reads. “They knew they could not perform, but cunningly waited until G2 had publicly announced its partnership with Bondly to its millions of fans to reap the benefits of publicity through the highly valuable G2 brand.”

On its website, Bondly describes itself as a company that “[executes] every step of the process to bring authenticated digital-first goods to the market in music, entertainment, gaming and collectibles with a suite of products and services designed to support the entire blockchain ecosystem.” The company’s website also references past NFT partnerships with singer-songwriter Lewis Capaldi and Internet personality Logan Paul.

Over the past few years, a number of esports organizations have gotten involved in cryptocurrency, including Sentinels, Ninjas in Pyjamas, FaZe Clan and 100 Thieves, among others.

“It’s easy to hate on NFTs due to previous catastrophic cash grab attempts from weasels,”tweetedCarlos “ocelote” Rodríguez, founder and CEO of G2 on June 3, 2021, when the company’s partnership with Bondly was first announced. “We are doing this for the right reasons and will be around for decades to come[.]”

Arts

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/esports/2022/03/22/g2-esports-nft-lawsuit/

Interesting NFTs
#64878
By OthersideDeployer
CryptoBots
Beware of the CryptoBots.
Blues
Ciao! My name's Blues. I once peed on Confucius's cat. They had it coming. It's not common knowledge, but my ancestry connects me to Confucius. Purrhaps this is the beginning of a beautiful relationship.
YouTube Lab
YouTube logo factory. 10-second loop, 30 fps. Created using Cinema4D, X-Particles, TurbulenceFD, Octane, and After Effects.
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great José Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?