12/08/2022 NFT Heists: Are Recent Attacks the First of Many to Come?

NFT Heists: Are Recent Attacks the First of Many to Come?

NFT heists are hitting the news. Here how you can protect yourself, saysIndrėViltrakytė, co-founder of theThe Rebels.

Phishing attacks are not new. Sometimes, they are easy to spot. Like when the prompts come with a request to send your banking information to a prince from a far-away foreign land. But sometimes, they are harder to spot. Like when a request to approve the release of your assets comes from a seemingly trustworthy source.

This is what happened recently in an NFT phishing theft case. Users trusted a scheme that involved thePremint platform. The users agreed to a prompt to approve an unknown entity to control their assets.

On July 17, 2022, a popular NFT platform, Premint NFT, was hacked. 314 NFTs worth $430,000 were stolen. Perpetrators were able to plant malicious code on Premint’s official website. The code instructed users to “set approvals for all” when connecting their digital wallets to the site. This allowed the attackers to access their crypto assets and steal their NFTs.

The new world of NFTs – digital art collection – may be in line for more phishing attacks.

NFT heists: What are being stolen?

Typically when we hear the word NFT, we think of a digital image that is unique and connected to the blockchain. It is, however, more elaborate than that. When talking about NFTs, the ownership tracking and uniqueness are always accented. But nowhere in the NFT standard, it is stated what the unique tokens represent. In its essence, the tokens are only unique numbers. It’s the authors of the NFT collection who define what these tokens represent.

Furthermore, images are usually never “uploaded into thecrypto wallet.” They are not part of the NFT contract. A hash of the image might be written into the contract to create a connection with the thing that the NFT represents. Also, NFT as a standard doesn’t concern itself about the value or the buying and selling operations of the NFTs. It only supplies standard methods to transfer the NFT ownership. It’s the marketplaces and the community who build on top of that and treat the NFTs as merchandise.

As merchandise, NFTs are mostly purchased as collectibles, often used for investment purposes. They have developed practical use cases only recently. An example isdigital fashion wearablesin the Metaverse.

NFT heists

What can be done in the future?

Who’s to blame? Is it the user? Or the platform, which allowed an attacker to initiate a fraudulent transaction?

In this particular case, the attackers were able to display content to trick the user into signing the fraudulent transaction.

A vague, plausible-sounding reason for the transaction in combination with trust in the website was enough to fool many. That said, it is unreasonable to expect that the average Web3 user could skirt it. Most didn’t have a strong enough tech background to notice that the transaction was actually giving someone access to his or her NFTs.

It’s possible to trick users into signing transactions if it’s initiated by a trusted website. The assets in the users’ wallets are only as safe as ALL the decentralized applications (dapps) that the user interacts with put together. Identical cases are likely to happen in the future.

The wayssecuritycan be improved:

1. Wallets could display more human-oriented information for known contract interaction types. For example, a huge red message saying, “Hey, you’re giving control for all of your NFTs to someone!” That would be much better than the current all caps “SET APPROVAL FOR ALL” in gray in the MetaMask’s transaction confirmation window.

2. Websites could list and publish the contract interactions that they might initiate. The providers likeMetaMaskcould refuse any non-standard transactions.

NFT heists: How can users protect themselves

– Review the transaction details before signing. This won’t protect the user 100% of the time. But reviewing what method on what contract is crucial.

– Separate NFTs (and other crypto assets) into multiple wallets. If the users are tricked into giving someone control of their assets in onewallet, at least the assets in other wallets are safe. This is as long as you don’t share your private key or the seed phrase.

– Use different wallets for different dapps. It’s not always practical to do so when the dapp is meant to interact with other assets in the wallet. However, it’s important to try keeping only what’s relevant.

About the Author

Indrė Viltrakytėis the co-founder of the Web3 fashion ventureThe Rebels. It has 10101 unique characters based on the controversial “Jesus, Maria” ad campaign. The campaign was banned but later found justice in the European Court of Human Rights, which ruled in favor of the brand. The case is now held as a precedent in cases related to freedom of expression in the EU. Indrė Viltrakytė has 10+ years of experience in the fashion industry.

Arts

https://beincrypto.com/nft-heists-attacks-many-to-come/

Interesting NFTs
Another Day In Paradise
Just as the book speaks to intelligence, the image in all its muteness speaks to the heart.
#47849
By OthersideDeployer
CryptoPunk #2338
The CryptoPunks are 10,000 uniquely generated characters. No two are exactly alike, and each one of them can be officially owned by a single person on the Ethereum blockchain. Originally, they could be claimed for free by anybody with an Ethereum wallet, but all 10,000 were quickly claimed. Now they must be purchased from someone via the marketplace that's also embedded in the blockchain.
SolPunk_#8724
NERD CLOWN
Who Is The Creator 2
The idea for this piece was borne out of a tweet of mine that caused a bit of a stir. I’d posted a link to a blog article I’d written a number of months previous titled ‘Who is the Creator’ discussing various types of creative collaborations and why I hire people to work on my animations. It generated a lot of debate around creation and attribution with the community split on whether it’s right or wrong for an artist to hire other professionals to help them realize their art projects. I decided to push the boundaries even further and see how the cryptoart community responded. What if I quite literally had nothing to do with the physical or digital elements of the work other than coming up with the concept and coordinating it? I decided there was one artist in the space who could add huge value to this idea on levels that none other could and so I gathered my courage and contacted the great JosĂ© Delbo to ask him if he’d be interested in a very unique collaboration. I explained to him that to make this piece ‘work’ he couldn't have any say in what I produced and moreover, he wouldn’t even be allowed to see the animation until it was dropped on MakersPlace. To my surprise, Mr Delbo agreed to my proposal. The animation tells the story of the creative process, which includes my roles as writer, director, and producer working with a team and making edits and changes ‘in real time’. The dialogue between myself and my ‘hired guns’ plays out in front of the viewer. The music written for the piece adds to the nostalgia of the comic book superhero theme but other elements such as the snapping and kicking of the pencil and the signing of my signature at the bottom incorporates further layers and challenges the viewer to ask important questions, such as, is the ‘Art’ the final animation (the creation) or is the ‘Art’ the concept/credit for the creation itself?