29/07/2021 Can NFTs Rescue Dolce & Gabbana in China?

Dolce & Gabbana is launching a set of NFTs called Collezione Genesi. But will it help solve the Italian luxury brand's China problems? Photo: Shutterstock

Key Takeaways:

Non-fungible tokens (NFT) are the latest craze in the luxury world. And while key figures in the retail industry continue to debate the potential of blockchain and how to harness the full power of NFTs, some industry players are already a few steps ahead of the pack. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Prada Group, and Compagnie Financière Richemont have launched AURA. Burberry and Mythical Games have collaborated to launch exclusive NFTs featured in Blankos Block Party. And RTFKT — a digital luxury label renowned for viral golden sneakers — is the first brand to set foot in the NFT luxury space.

Indisputably, these are pioneering luxury brands known for mapping the road ahead for innovation; hence, this isn’t a surprise move. However, the fact that Italian luxury brand Dolce & Gabbana has joined the NFT party is unexpected. The Italian duo behind the Dolce & Gabbana label is more known for tax evasion scandals, questionable ad campaigns, and racist Instagram exchanges than an embrace of disruptive technologies, crypto, or innovation. And yet, Dolce & Gabbana is partnering with UNXD to launch an exclusive NFT collection, according to Cointelegraph.

 

The collection, called Collezione Genesi (Genesis Collection), will be highlighted in the upcoming shows for Alta Moda, Alta Sartoria, and Alta Goilleria in Venice and will focus on artistic traditions from Venice.

The designer duo found inspiration for the initial concept of the collection in a dream from Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana called L’abito dei Sogni(Dress from a Dream). Cointelegraph highlights that additional NFTs in the Collezione Genesi will be disclosed closer to the date of the Alta Moda, Alta Sartoria, and Alta Goilleria shows.

By entering the NFT realm, Dolce & Gabbana made a masterful move that will surely help it boost its clientele pool. However, that doesn’t mean the backlash against the designer duo will dial down in China.

Young, hyper-connected Chinese consumers see value in owning non-fungible assets, especially those endorsed by luxury houses. But Dolce & Gabbana will have a hard time cracking that market. Not only do they have to overcome a big PR disaster and appear as a reformed brand, but they also have to discern market trends and understand the new direction of the Chinese market. Since the Italian label rarely changes its design direction of collections heavily inspired by Italy and the “dolce vita” lifestyle, that could be a difficult endeavor.

Moreover, since Dolce & Gabbana was left high and dry in China, genderless fashion and streetwear have begun winning over locals. And Dolce & Gabbana stands as the opposite of these styles. Its highly curated and extravagant designs are an ode to femininity, which is the opposite pole of genderless fashion.

And while the brand carries some sweatshirts, graphic tees, and trunks, those designs don’t stand out on their own. Accordingly, they cannot compete with immensely popular brands like Supreme and Off-White, which understand China’s youth culture and strongly connect with skateboard-loving teens, who are a big part of the new luxury consumer segment.

D&G is known for its bold, contemporary style, as seen in its collaboration with basketball star P.J. Tucker (left) and leopard print accessories line. Photo: D&G’s Weibo

As for the launch of Collezione Genesi, the Italian duo made another miscalculation. It is highly doubtful that young Chinese consumers are interested in owning an NFT from designers associated with racist outbursts.

If Dolce & Gabbana thought blockchain and NFTs would be a successful strategy for its business comeback in China, they should have created a more personalized and up-to-date blueprint. For obvious reasons, a collaboration with a Chinese visual artist, KOL, or vlogger would have been more appropriate. Additionally, Dolce & Gabbana could have incorporated the NFTs into a video game, taking full advantage of Gen Z’s love of gaming.

It is safe to say that L’abito dei Sogni won’t redeem Dolce & Gabbana in China. Moreover, the designer duo seems poised to fall into oblivion in The Middle Kingdom, considering their NFT experiments won’t create value and aren’t in line with the social zeitgeist.

Arts

https://jingdaily.com/dolce-and-gabbana-nfts-china/

Interesting NFTs
CryptoPunk #6817
The CryptoPunks are 10,000 uniquely generated characters. No two are exactly alike, and each one of them can be officially owned by a single person on the Ethereum blockchain. Originally, they could be claimed for free by anybody with an Ethereum wallet, but all 10,000 were quickly claimed. Now they must be purchased from someone via the marketplace that's also embedded in the blockchain.
ℤ
Things are not always as they seem. Living in poverty is like serving a sentence in a prison with invisible bars. The keys are in plain sight, yet impossible to reach. Screen time captivates us with its addictive dopamine triggers, plucking at our attention span until we are no longer aware of the present... What if both worlds collide? Hand-rendered acrylics on bristol board scanned and converted into a digital image.
Despair
A gothic artpiece glorifying the worst of feelings , materialized by an ornate skull and dark mandalas
Alex in Wonderland
A figure, Alex, stands mostly naked in the midst of a physical and psychological maelstrom. He is clad only in nostalgic 80’s era socks, on a tenuous island between active waters and a variety of shark denizens. Sharks on the right side of the image are all beached, including a shark with a quartz crystal snout, an orange shark wrapped in a life buoy, and a shark further in the distance wearing an 80’s style shirt with the number “88”. On the left side is the largest shark, wearing bright glossy red lipstick and brandishing prominent teeth with braces. She is cordoned off from the figure by a roped float divider, and within her thought bubble is a warning symbol. Behind the figure, hovering in the air, are Grey aliens emerging from the distance, out of a series of elliptical UFO shaped interdimensional membranes. The Greys take on the visual form of spermazoa ostensibly impregnating the interdimensional thresholds. As is typical, these Greys inhabit a zone just behind the unconscious topology of Alex’s dissociative mind. Though Alex’s bottom half is representative, his top half mutates into a psychological cornucopia. In a manner akin to “Auto-Erotic Sphinx”, a predecessor work, the figure has self suctioned—an act of sensual infatuation, enjoyment, and exploration. Upward exists the figure’s primary conscious eye, adorned with a revolutionary beret emblazoned with a Bitcoin badge. The figure’s summit features the nose of a fighter jet facing off against video game Bullet Bills, one of whom is marked by a communist North Korean star. A cropped section of a UFO observes the contest. Alex’s mind branches both left and right. To the left is more singular embodied consciousness, manifesting two eyes and a Ganesh trunk grasping crayons. The right branch dissociates upward diagonally, emerging into an array of eyes, faces, teeth, tail, a unicorn horn, and much more—all of which participate in expressing his unconscious being; a democracy of psychic factions representing thought impressions and associations. All illumination and darkness– fernal, infernal, high consciousness and corporeal underbelly–reside in this realm. In the distance are relatively languid, light clouds, and against the firmament hovers a colossal distant eye peering over the scene and far beyond. This painting possesses underlying genetic traits with previous works such as “Auto-Erotic Sphinx with Toys”, “Dionysus”, and “Fuku-Shiva”. The work serves also as a nod to an earlier period of art inspiration during late teens and early twenties— born out of the nakedness, vulnerability, curiosity, and wonder inherent to coming of age and all subsequent psychedelic revelation.
Source Code for the WWW
OWNER: Sir Tim Berners-Lee Sir Tim Berners-Lee, b. 1955 Source Code for the WWW 1990-1991 Work includes: Original archive of dated and time-stamped files containing the source code, written between 3 October 1990 and 24 August 1991. These files contain code with approximately 9,555 lines, the contents of which include implementations of the three languages and protocols invented by Sir Tim; HTML (Hypertext Markup Language); HTTP (Hyper Transfer Protocol); and URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers), as well as the original HTML documents that instructed early web users on how to use the application Animated visualization of the code being written (Video, black & white, silent), lasting 30 minutes 25 seconds A Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) representation of the full code (A0 841mm wide by 1189 mm high), created by Sir Tim from the original files using Python, with a graphic representation of his physical signature at lower right A letter written in the README.md file (in “markdown” format) by Sir Tim in June of 2021, reflecting upon the code and his process of creating it Non-fungible Token ERC-721 Minted on June 15, 2021, ed. 1/1 Smart Contract Address: 0x86ade256037d80d6d42df8df96d5be21cd25bd8f